16 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Ricky H commented  ·  February 19, 2011 01:18  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Greasefire is still indexing lame scripts that spam the Include header. Remember when the Greasefire icon would only light up when a REAL script was detected? NOPE me neither, it was too long ago.

• dayshua commented  ·  January 14, 2011 17:26  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  remove remove remove ads

• dayshua commented  ·  January 14, 2011 17:25  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  please tell me how to get these dumb ass ads off my facebook page its is so fucking dumb and annoying please pleas remove from my facebook period

• Anonymous commented  ·  December 16, 2010 23:43  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It's actually unneeded feature. It'll be best if "deprecated/malicious/broken/useless" script warning appear for such scripts but not anything above it. And it should only appear after 10 negative reviews with some captcha-checks.

• Piyush Soni commented  ·  October 15, 2010 15:00  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  People could make wrong use of this feature in removing a good legitimate script - by writing - (yes you guessed it right) scripts !

• Tamie Hamilton commented  ·  January 19, 2010 17:00  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  If it is malware, maybe they could keep the ability to view the sourcecode (to perhaps help remedy the situation) but diable the install button.

• ycc2106 commented  ·  October 10, 2009 12:45  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Same topic here: http://userscripts.uservoice.com/pages/795-general/suggestions/6170-implement-flag-as-spam-in-the-forums

• peteb commented  ·  September 02, 2009 08:35  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I would Vote for this as well only if there was a mechanism in place to prevent people from creating new usernames just to vote a script up or down. I see this type of abuse in the comment system.

• aeosynth commented  ·  July 02, 2009 01:09  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  userstyles.org has a nice 'obsoleted by' notification (see: http://userstyles.org/styles/1761). Maybe we could have two notifications: one from the author, another from the community (think stackoverflow.com).

• maxxyme commented  ·  January 14, 2009 06:02  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I just commented on/reviewed a script that is completely outdated as the feature he implements is now widely available on the targeted website!!!

• missdipsy commented  ·  January 05, 2009 04:25  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I voted for this but I agree that unlisting (or perhaps something like marking them as "deprecated" and giving users an extra warning before installing them - see http://userscripts.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/6176-implement-some-form-of-deprecated-tag-for-old-scripts) would be better. If they are "unlisted" there should still be some way to access them if necessary.

• w35l3y commented  ·  September 25, 2008 06:38  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I vote for removal of duplicated scripts and there should have something automatic avoid people from uploading duplicated scripts based on CRC32, MD5, SHA1 or whatever.

• Adminanotherjesse (Admin, Userscripts.org) commented  ·  August 03, 2008 19:55  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I agree that unlisting is better. I think this will be part of the change that will allow authors to mark their scripts as deprecated.

• Adminjerone (Admin, Userscripts.org) commented  ·  August 01, 2008 03:20  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I agree with znerp here. Deleting scripts would disadvantage people who use the script and also the maker if he/she want to update it later on.

• znerp commented  ·  July 24, 2008 00:15  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I would say that making them unlisted would be a better idea than actually deleting them.

• topio commented  ·  July 23, 2008 10:26  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  this is a great idea I just commented on 3 scripts today for the site mail.com
  that have not been updated since 2006